Become a Votebeat sponsor

Dearborn overwhelmingly rejects wards proposal

The proposal would have divided the Detroit suburb of more than 100,000 people into wards.

A photograph of a yellow political sign on a sidewalk outside with a grey sky in the background.
A political sign on Wed., Nov. 5, 2025 in Dearborn, Michigan. (Hayley Harding / Votebeat)

Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up for Votebeat Michigan’s free newsletter here.

Dearborn voters overwhelmingly rejected a ballot measure that would have expanded their city council and split the Detroit suburb into council wards.

Unofficial results from the city show that nearly 71% of voters voted against the proposal.

The goal, Dearborn Wants Wards organizers told Votebeat over the summer, was to use geographic wards to help address the fact that the bulk of the city’s council members come from only a select few neighborhoods.

Increasing geographic diversity could help address flooding problems in the eastern part of the city or pollution problems in the city’s south end, organizers believed. Such a change would have put Dearborn in league with other large cities around the state who use a district-based system, including Detroit.

The group collected about 8,000 signatures to get on the ballot, but the unofficial election results show that only around 7,300 voters of more than 25,000 ultimately voted in favor of the change.

Organizers did not respond to a request for comment from Votebeat Wednesday morning.

The proposal was controversial from the moment it was approved for the ballot. Some, including former state Rep. Gary Woronchak, said they believed it would actually minimize representation for each Dearborn resident.

There was also a question of legality. The state attorney general’s office reviews all potential amendments to city charters, and in a September letter about the proposal, Assistant Attorney General Patrick Fitzgerald wrote that this ballot question addressed too many things in a single question.

Addressing multiple topics in the same question could violate the state’s Home Rule City Act, which sets standards for maintaining and changing local charters.

The proposal was “facially defective” as a result, Fitzgerald wrote. While the AG’s office reviews proposals, it is ultimately up to local communities whether a ballot issue appears before voters.

If voters had approved the proposal, it likely would have immediately gone to court, the Detroit Free Press reported, to determine if it was within the bounds of the state’s Home Rule City Act. Mark Brewer, representing Dearborn Wants Wards, told the Free Press that he believed the proposal “fully complies with the law.”

Hayley Harding is a reporter for Votebeat based in Michigan. Contact Hayley at hharding@votebeat.org.

The Latest

The saga of far-right Antrim County Clerk Victoria Bishop shows how many safeguards are built into the U.S. election system.

A dispute between the state’s second-largest county and its election agency highlights different approaches to the prospect of federal intervention at the polls.

Foreign-made parts in voting machines pose risks, but experts say companies are able to contain concerns

The 25 voters were initially suspected of being noncitizens, but a county investigation found last month that they were actually citizens.

Voters told Votebeat that they just don’t trust the mail anymore.

Justice Department acts to challenge as many as 20,000 California ballots as early voting is already underway