Become a Votebeat sponsor

Watch a Q&A with Pennsylvania’s top elections official

Al Schmidt, Pennsylvania’s secretary of state, answered audience questions about trust in elections and misinformation.

A man wearing a dark suit jacket and glasses poses for a portrait outside of a building in front of a group of people behind a fence.
Al Schmidt, then Philadelphia City Commissioner, stands outside the Pennsylvania Convention Center on Nov. 6, 2020 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Lynsey Addario / Getty Images)

Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up for our free newsletters here.

This year, Pennsylvania voters will cast their ballots for president, members of Congress, top state offices such as attorney general and treasurer, and more.

In 2020, the state was subjected to false claims of election fraud fueled by former President Donald Trump. The claims led to a flood of lawsuits, some of which went to the state’s Supreme Court and sowed distrust in Pennsylvania’s election system.

On April 2, Al Schmidt, head of the Pennsylvania Department of State, joined Votebeat and Spotlight PA to discuss how his agency is working to create trust in our election system and combat misinformation. The event also included a Q&A with a University of Pittsburgh researcher on how to spot election misinformation.

Watch the event in full below:


The Latest

Lists of noncitizens are prone to error, and comparing them to the voter rolls can lead to false positives.

It’s the process that keeps ballots secure. When it’s not maintained, voters can be disenfranchised.

After years of collaboration on election security, states say federal support is retreating — and trust is collapsing.

The ruling could increase the number of lawsuits over elections — but also encourage candidates to bring them sooner.

Courts have so far blocked key provisions of the president’s executive order, but it’s had more influence over federal agencies.

Matthew Laiss sought to have his charges dismissed based on the ‘plain language’ of the president’s broadly worded pardon proclamation. Prosecutors objected.