Become a Votebeat sponsor

Apache County, Arizona, official who oversaw troubled Election Day is out

Navajo Nation officials had called for accountability after equipment failures left voters waiting in long lines.

Two people stand in front of ballot secrecy stands while voting in a room.
Voters mark their ballots at a polling station on the Navajo Nation in Fort Defiance, Arizona, on Election Day on Nov. 5, 2024. Voters across Apache County experienced long lines because of widespread equipment failures. (Andres Leighton / AP)

Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up for Votebeat Arizona’s free newsletter here.

The official who oversaw Apache County’s November election during widespread technical problems at polling places is no longer in her position, Votebeat has learned.

Rita Vaughan is out as county elections director, JP Martin, a spokesperson for the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office confirmed. The county manager did not respond to a request for comment about the reasons for Vaughan’s departure, or the date she left. Vaughan also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Voters and Navajo Nation officials have called for accountability after the Election Day problems across the county, which contains a large section of the Navajo Nation in the northeast corner of the state.

Voters seeking to cast ballots had to wait in lines for hours after the county’s equipment failed. Polling places that had emergency ballots quickly ran out, and for many voters, the only option was to use an accessible voting device until new equipment arrived, according to voters and observers. Polling places typically have only one or two of those accessible devices, which are designed for people with disabilities.

After the Navajo Nation sued on Election Day, an Apache County Superior Court judge ordered select polling places to stay open for two hours past the originally scheduled closing time. Lawyers for the Navajo Nation told the judge that, despite the county’s assertions, the problems persisted throughout the day, and some voters who were in line for hours in the cold chose to leave without voting.

Ethel Branch, the Navajo Nation Attorney General at the time, said later that month that the voters were disenfranchised.

“Despite this ruling, we will not be deterred from holding Apache County accountable for honoring all Navajo votes in future elections,” Branch wrote in a Nov. 22 Navajo Nation Department of Justice news release.

Vaughan told Votebeat on Election Day that the problem was with the county’s ballot-on-demand printers, and the county issued a news release saying the same. But county officials have not provided more details.

The Navajo Nation filed a second lawsuit after the election, asking a judge to provide more time for voters to fix problems with signatures on their ballots, because of delays in notifying voters of the problems. The county recorder, not the elections director, is in charge of that process. The judge dismissed that lawsuit.

Jen Fifield is a reporter for Votebeat based in Arizona. Contact Jen at jfifield@votebeat.org.

The Latest

The Texas House is considering a bill to abolish May elections, which have the lowest turnout of any election.

Between a new vote and a nearly identical petition drive starting soon, voters still have a chance to weigh in on proof of citizenship in the state.

Arizona’s election manual sought to make it clear that county supervisors had no choice. But a judge’s ruling says it’s not up to state officials to decide.

There’s no evidence to suggest that it’s a widespread problem, or even a medium-sized one. But the talk persists, and it’s driving policy.

Featuring Secretaries of State Adrian Fontes of Arizona and David Scanlan of New Hampshire, you’ll learn about the practical realities of requiring documented proof of citizenship for elections.

Democrats and other critics say a House bill threatens to disenfranchise people who can’t easily access the right documents.