Become a Votebeat sponsor

Judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit over Michigan’s voter rolls

The Department of Justice has sued 25 jurisdictions for not handing over voter data; three of the suits have now been dismissed.

A photograph of a white woman's face with blonde hair and wearing a red suit jacket stares ahead with two people who are seen blurry in the background.
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson waits to testify before the House of Representatives in 2024. A lawsuit against Benson from the Department of Justice was dismissed on Tuesday. (Bill Clark / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up for Votebeat Michigan’s free newsletter here.

UPDATE March 2, 2026, 4:50 p.m.: The U.S. Department of Justice filed an appeal in this decision on Feb. 27. Opening materials in the case are due to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals by March 13.

A federal judge has dismissed the U.S. Department of Justice’s lawsuit against Michigan over the state’s refusal to give the department an unredacted list of registered voters, finding the state isn’t required by federal law to turn it over.

Last year, the Department of Justice requested unredacted voter data from virtually every state as part of President Donald Trump’s quest to root out noncitizen voters, which are extremely rare. The department requested a copy of Michigan’s voter roll in July, along with answers to a series of questions about its voter registration practices.

In September, Michigan provided a redacted version of the voter roll that withheld voters’ personally identifiable information, which the state said was necessary to avoid breaking state and federal law. The Department of Justice then sued Michigan for the complete data later that month.

However, on Tuesday, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou of the Western District of Michigan, a Trump nominee, dismissed the case. Jarbou wrote in her opinion that none of the three laws that the Department of Justice had used to justify its request — the Civil Rights Act of 1960, the National Voter Registration Act, and the Help America Vote Act — required the disclosure of the data.

Justice Department officials have argued that obtaining voter rolls is necessary in order for the department to make sure states are complying with federal requirements for how voter rolls should be maintained. Over the past year, the Department of Justice has sued 24 states, plus Washington, D.C., for not sharing their data. Federal judges have also so far dismissed the suits against California and Oregon.

A spokesperson for Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.

The Department of Justice also did not immediately respond to a request for comment, including a question about whether it would appeal the ruling.

Read more Votebeat coverage of the Justice Department’s lawsuits and requests seeking state voter rolls:

Nathaniel Rakich is Votebeat’s managing editor and is based in Washington, D.C. Contact Nathaniel at nrakich@votebeat.org.

The Latest

Experts say the logs confirm what had been clear from the start: A human error delayed results in the August primary but there was no tampering.

Election officials say switching maps was manageable. The harder problem was not knowing which one they would ultimately be required to use.

Thomas Carroll represented Fulton County and faced a harsh rebuke from the state Supreme Court.

With less than two months until the midterms, the messy court battle is nearing a conclusion.

The charges come as the Trump administration attempts to crack down on voter fraud.

The Michigan Supreme Court said it did not have the power to force canvassers to put the proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot.