Become a Votebeat sponsor

Dallas Democrats withdraw lawsuit seeking to count primary ballots cast during extended voting hours

Dallas and Williamson counties switched from centralized voting sites to neighborhood precincts in the primary, confusing voters and prompting lower courts to extend some polling site hours.

A photograph of two people talking with each other outside of a building that has a ton of posters and signs.
Brandy McIver, a first time voter, is turned away from the Oak Lawn Branch Library voting center on primary Election Day in Dallas on March 3,  2026. Dallas Democrats had sued to extend voting hours, but have now withdrawn the lawsuit. (Shelby Tauber for The Texas Tribune)

Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up for Votebeat Texas’ free newsletter here.

What happened?

Primary ballots cast by Democratic voters in Dallas who got in line to vote after 7 p.m. won’t be tallied, after the county Democratic party Thursday withdrew a lawsuit seeking to have them counted.

Dallas County officials had told Votebeat 1,756 Democratic ballots were in limbo pending the resolution of the lawsuit.

Dallas County Democrats said the party had determined the Texas Supreme Court “is no longer a viable forum for seeking a fair and independent application of the law regarding this issue.”

The Texas Supreme Court has yet to rule on a lawsuit involving ballots cast after 7 p.m. at two Williamson County polling places. That ruling will determine whether 12 ballots in the Democratic primary and 4 ballots in the Republican primary should be counted, county officials said.

What’s the dispute?

This year, Republicans in Dallas and Williamson counties chose not to use centralized countywide voting locations, as had long been both counties’ practice. That decision came as Republicans statewide have made unfounded claims that countywide voting makes elections less secure. As a result, all voters in those counties — Democratic and Republican — were required to cast ballots at their assigned neighborhood polling places on March 3.

The change confused and frustrated many voters who went to the locations where they typically vote and found themselves being redirected, sometimes to polling places a considerable distance away.

Democrats in both counties asked courts to extend polling place hours, and judges in each county granted the extension. In both counties, voters who got in line after 7 p.m. at polling places covered by the orders were allowed to cast provisional ballots. But Paxton’s office intervened, arguing his office had not been properly notified of the request, and later on March 3, the Texas Supreme Court issued orders instructing the counties to separate any ballots from voters who were not in line by 7 p.m. Those votes were not included in the unofficial results released so far.

Why it matters

The temporary order by the Texas Supreme Court had left unclear whether votes cast by people who arrived after 7 p.m. in both counties would be part of the final vote count.

Read more Votebeat coverage of the Texas primary:

Natalia Contreras covers election administration and voting access for Votebeat in partnership with the Texas Tribune. Natalia is based in Corpus Christi. Contact her at ncontreras@votebeat.org.

The Latest

Republicans can try to push noncitizen voting legislation, while Democrats may try to implement automatic voter registration.

In July, the Department of Homeland Security said it had identified 250,000 potential noncitizens registered to vote, including nearly 15,000 in Pennsylvania.

Michiganders are voting for a new governor, a new U.S. senator, new legislators, and more.

State officials also referred 117 potential noncitizens for investigation, but confirmed nearly 600 other flagged voters are citizens.

The Supreme Court ruling marked the culmination of a frenzied, monthslong legal battle.

A majority of justices declined to allow the U.S. Postal Service to put new restrictions in place for November.