Become a Votebeat sponsor

U.S. Supreme Court temporarily restores Texas’ new congressional map

Legal battle over the state’s mid-decade redistricting continues ahead of the candidate filing deadline.

A photograph of the U.S. Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito granted Texas' request to pause a court ruling that would have required the state to use congressional district boundaries that legislators drew in 2021, instead of newly drawn ones.  (Jason Garza for The Texas Tribune)

Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up for Votebeat Texas’ free newsletter here.

This story was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Texas is back to using its 2025 congressional map, at least temporarily, after Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito granted the state’s request to pause a court ruling that would have required using the lines legislators drew in 2021.

The high court has not yet decided what map Texas should use while the court battle over the legality of the map plays out over the coming weeks and months; Friday’s ruling is a short-term pause while they make that decision.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton celebrated the step as a victory, and said his office would “look forward to continuing to press forward in our case on the merits.”

President Donald Trump pushed Texas to redraw its map over the summer, hoping to secure five additional GOP seats to shore up the party’s narrow majority in the U.S. House through the midterms. On Tuesday, a federal court barred Texas from using the new map for 2026, saying there was evidence state lawmakers had racially gerrymandered in redrawing the lines.

Galveston District Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, authored the opinion ordering Texas to return to its 2021 map, while 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jerry Smith vociferously dissented.

Alito requested that the plaintiffs respond to the motion by the end of the day Monday. The Dec. 8 candidate filing deadline is fast approaching, which the state made clear to the justices in its petition.

The Latest

Lists of noncitizens are prone to error, and comparing them to the voter rolls can lead to false positives.

It’s the process that keeps ballots secure. When it’s not maintained, voters can be disenfranchised.

After years of collaboration on election security, states say federal support is retreating — and trust is collapsing.

The ruling could increase the number of lawsuits over elections — but also encourage candidates to bring them sooner.

Courts have so far blocked key provisions of the president’s executive order, but it’s had more influence over federal agencies.

Matthew Laiss sought to have his charges dismissed based on the ‘plain language’ of the president’s broadly worded pardon proclamation. Prosecutors objected.